|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HighRoadNow > State Best Practices > High Wages and Productivity > Contingent Worker Benefits > Legislative Reform |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Model Practices Select Survey of Pending Non-Standard Worker Legislation Lessons For Reforming 21st Century Labor Subcontracting: How 19th Century reformers attacked the “sweating system” Organizing for Workplace Equity: Model State Legislation for “Nonstandard”
Key Principle: Joint Employers According to NELP, where two entities or more entities share responsibility for determining whether a person is employed and the nature of that employment, those entities should generally be treated as “joint employers.” Joint employer status promotes greater accountability among businesses that use labor intermediaries and helps to ensure that workers enjoy the employment protections to which they are entitled. Although the definition of employment under some laws is broad enough to lead to a joint employer finding, some labor laws and regulations should be revised and broadened. In addition, employer misclassification of employees as “independent contractors” leads to no responsibility for the businesses employing those workers. Many states have enacted laws to combat employer misclassification, and some states prohibit it in certain sectors. State laws regulating the temporary help industry and prohibiting the contracting out of responsibility for work done in a business are ground-breaking laws that have much promise. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
home | login | my profile | join our network | about us | contact us | forums | site map
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||